-->

CIMB Research 2015-07-30: Singapore Exchange (SGX) - Weak derivatives, one-off costs. Maintain REDUCE.

Weak derivatives, one-off costs 


  • SGX’s 4QFY6/15 net profit (S$96.2m) was below our expectation due to a lack in the pickup of derivatives fees and presence of one-off costs, though it was in-line with consensus estimates. 
  • Full-year profit was 98%/99% of our/consensus forecasts. 
  • We were expecting 4Q earnings to lift-off 16% qoq, on the back of record-high traded volumes of the China A50 index futures (+79% qoq); but, 4Q earnings was only +9% qoq as tighter clearing rates meant derivatives fees were only +8% qoq. 
  • Add some one-off cost items and results came in short. 
  • Our forecast is unchanged. Our DDM-based target price slips marginally to S$7.98. 
  • The results show that SGX’s A50 exposure does not necessarily flow through to earnings, and as the A-share market recedes, another catalyst for underperformance could emerge. 
  • Maintain Reduce. 


Derivatives drive sequential revenue growth, but overhyped 


  • SGX’s 4QFY15 revenue of S$216m (+8% qoq) failed to live up to the hope that had been stoked up by the dramatic pick-up seen in the China A50 contract volumes this quarter. 
  • 4Q derivative revenue only grew 8% qoq, disappointing considering that total derivative volume rose 36% qoq, on a big jump in China A50 and iron ore contract volumes. 
  • Securities ADVT grew incrementally in 4Q (+6% yoy, +2% qoq to S$1.2bn), but again, securities clearing fees (+4.5% yoy) were also muted by the change in clearing fee structure. 
  • With all the other revenue line items fairly flat, the inability of derivative fees to inflate as expected caused the topline disappointment vs. our expectations. 
  • The derivative disappointment was compensated by outperformance in stable fee streams such as depository services and listing fees, but it was not enough. 

Costs were higher-than-expected, albeit on one-off items 


  • Other than weaker-than-expected derivatives clearing fees, the other negative was costs. 
  • Overall, FY15 costs landed in at S$376.7m, some S$7m ahead of its prior cost guidance (S$360m-370m). 
  • 4Q saw some ~S$7m of one-off costs incurred, related to the trading disruption and shares vesting of the ex-CEO. 

Maintain Reduce 


  • Although SGX’s share price has come off since Apr, it is not yet enough for us to turn positive. 
  • The one-off costs should not bother investors. 
  • Our bigger grouse is: 
    1. the smaller beta of derivative fees to the volumes ramp-up, as seen in 4Q, and 
    2. slightly lower-than-expected DPS as dividend payout ease down to 86%. 


(Kenneth NG, CFA; Jessalynn CHEN)

Source: http://research.itradecimb.com/



Advertisement



MOST TALKED ABOUT STOCKS / REITS OF THE WEEK



loading.......